William Katz: Urgent Agenda
|
||
|
EDITED TAPES? - AT 5:55 P.M. ET: I have an almost visceral reaction to conspiracy theories. I think most of them are insane, often devised to make money, are sometimes politically motivated, and often do damage to historical understanding. The conspiracy theories surrounding the JFK assassination, especially the notion that the CIA did it, were particularly damaging. Oliver Stone's reckless film, "JFK," misled its youthful viewers. Even the History Channel has fallen prey at times. However, I'm willing to listen if someone comes forward with real evidence. I've always been uneasy about the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, believing that we may not know the full story. Once a "right-wing" conspiracy was identified, journalists seemed perfectly content to leave it at that. All talk of other connections was shut down rather quickly. Now, 14 years after the event, there's a new development that may - I stress may- be of significance. It appears that some of the surveillance tapes that caught the bombing were edited. The AP picked up the story:
COMMENT: Well, maybe, maybe not. There may be a valid technical explanation. Also, Mr. Trentadue has a personal interest in the case, as the story shows. Still, this is something that good investigative journalists should follow. Blanks on tapes are often causes for real concern. The 18-minute gap in a tape made by President Richard M. Nixon's secretary, Rose Mary Woods, was a key piece of evidence in the Watergate investigations. A blank in tapes made of children helped convince journalists in the 1980s that a child-abuse case was fraudulent. Care must be taken. I've never seen a conspiracy theory pan out. But any indication of tampering with evidence - like editing a tape - must be examined. September 27, 2009
|
|